A lot of that may have to do with the places I frequent. In France, I did not see a lot of police until I ventured near the Arc de Triomphe, then they were there in numbers, armed to the teeth. Antiterrorism, no doubt. Still, an absence of police, particularly well armed police is an indicator of confidence, I think. They aren't there because they aren't needed.
There were some places where there was a significant well armed military presence. For some reason the area around the Plaza de la Revolucion is designated a military zone and there you find the army with their automatic weapons maintaining a perimeter around the buildings and streets they want to keep you away from. In these places you feel the coercive presence - but it is a presence I did not feel anywhere else.
How do you account for this? Community policing. Every neighborhood has its a CDR (Committee for the Defense of the Revolution) - the eyes and ears of the revolution (government) They know what is going on and anti-social behavior (crime) is not likely to go unnoticed or unpunished. There is no upside to crime. It doesn't happen.
So the police act mostly as facilitators (traffic circulation) and problem solvers. I observed one incident that was remarkable. A woman was having a dispute with the man, following him and shouting. He ducked into a bar and the bouncer stepped up to bar her path. More shouting and now shoving. A policeman arrived - now she was shouting and shoving him. Imagine what happens next…
I was expecting her face in the sidewalk and cuffs. Nope, the policeman guided her to the corner, calmed her down and ended up consoling the now crying woman. The conclusion I reached is that the police are not feared and are not really seen as an instrument of oppression (they are unarmed, btw) It made me wonder: what if there was a demonstration? Would this regime arm them? Whose side would they take? It leaves me pondering one of the big questions I had in Cuba; Why don't Cubans protest?
No comments:
Post a Comment