Friday, September 17, 2010

Course Descriptions - Comparative federalism Europe, U.S.A., Canada



Comparative federalism Europe, U.S.A., Canada - POLI - 0507
Informations Générales
Intitulé du coursComparative federalism Europe, U.S.A., Canada
Langue d'enseignementEnseigné en anglais
NiveauNiveau 2 dans le cycle
DisciplineSciences politiques
Titulaire(s)Johanne POIRIER
Pré-requis
Cours pré-requis
Autres pré-requisA sound knowledge of English (both written and spoken)
Place du cours dans le programme
Objectifs et méthodologies
Objectifs du cours et compétences viséesDespite the mishaps of some of its real-life 
incarnations, the “federal idea” often summarised 
by the slogan “unity within diversity” is increasingly 
presented as the most effective way of maintaining 
a degree of territorial and social cohesion in a state-like 
structure, without the disadvantages of forced 
homogeneity. Nearly 40 % of the world population 
lives in a federal country. The European Union, 
Canada and the United States of America represent 
three historic efforts, in the words of The Federalist 
Papers, to create complex political institutions by 
“reason and choice” rather than by “accident and 
force” (though many in these countries would deny 
this !) This course engages in comparative analysis 
of the US, Canadian and various European federations 
(the later in the context of the EU integration). 
Consideration of the federal dimensions of the EU 
will also be canvassed. The approach to the course 
will be primarily institutional, though historical 
developments, normative discourse and political 
debates will also be covered. We will be concerned 
with the emergence of the federal or neo-federal 
systems, the institutional “architecture” of these 
systems, the patterns of interaction between federal 
partners. We will also address the issue of policy-making 
and policy-implementation in a federal context.
Contenu du coursThe course starts with a reflexion of the methodology 
of comparative law, as well as with the variety of 
institutional designs. The approach to the course is 
primarily institutional, though historical developments, 
normative discourse and political debates will also be 
covered.
Méthodes d'enseignementThis is a seminar course, and the method is largely 
participative. Students are expected to have read the 
material prior to class and to be ready for discussion.
Supports d'enseignementAlmost all documents are available through the Virtual 
University and some PPT
Références et BibliographieDocuments available through the internet or the Virtual 
University. A detailed course outline and bibliography 
will be provided at the beginning of the course.
Evaluation
MéthodeTo be determined (a written paper, an open-book 
written exam, or an oral exam, depending on the 
number of students)
Priorités de l'enseignantThis is conceived as a real participatory exercice. 
Students should be present, have read the materials 
and be ready to discuss them.
Conseils spécifiques
Langue d'évaluationEnglish
Organisation pratique
Institution organisatriceULB
Faculté gestionnaireInstitut Etudes Européennes
HorairePremier quadrimestre - Deuxième quadrimestre
Coordination pédagogique
Contactjpoirier@ulb.ac.be (please put “Comparative federalism 
– IEE” in object of message) (0)2 650 4819 Office H. 3118 
(by appointment only) Secretariat: Ms Nadia SERONT 
Office: H.3 116 Phone: (02) 650 3968
Remarques

Course Descriptions - The political system of the EU


A link to this form on its native site:

The Political System of the EU - POLI - 0405


Informations Générales
Intitulé du coursThe political system of the EU
Langue d'enseignementEnseigné en anglais
NiveauNiveau 1 dans le cycle
DisciplineSciences politiques
Titulaire(s)Olivier COSTA
Pré-requis
Cours pré-requis
Autres pré-requis
Place du cours dans le programme
Objectifs et méthodologies
Objectifs du cours et compétences visées
The aim of the course is to undertake a critical analysis 
of EU institutional structure and political functioning.
Contenu du cours
It proposes a reflection on the nature of EU political 
system and polity, by looking at its history and 
constitutional design. It then examines how the EU 
institutions are appointed; how they function; their 
respective powers; how they interact with other and 
with the national political institution and civil society 
actors. It describes the European policy making. It 
finally examines the process of institutional reform and 
the challenges EU is facing today. There is a written 
examination.
Méthodes d'enseignementEx Cathedra course
Supports d'enseignement
English syllabus (100 p.) published each year by the 
Presses de l'Université de Bruxelles under the supervision 
of the prof. PowerPoint slides (165 p.) available to students 
on the intranet.
Références et Bibliographie
Peterson, J. and Shackleton, M. ( eds )(2006) The 
Institutions of the European Union. Oxford, OUP, 2nd 
edition. Hix, S. (2005) 
The Political System of the European Union. Basingstoke, 
Macmillan. Magnette, P. ( 2005 ) What is the European 
Union? Nature and Prospects, Palgrave Macmillan; 
Quermonne, J.-L. ( 2010 ) Le Système Politique de l'Union 
Européenne. Paris Montchrestien, 8ème édition; Richard 
Jeremy ( ed ) ( 2006 ), European Union: Power and 
Policy-Making, London, Routledge, 3rd edition; Wallace 
Hellen & William ( eds ) ( 2005 ), Policy-making in the 
European Union, Oxford University Press, 5th edition; 
Costa, O. and Brack,N., Le fonctionnement de l'Union 
européenne, Editions de l'Université de Bruxelles ( 2011 )
Evaluation
Méthode
Written exam (2 hours): 4 short questions to be answered 
in a limited space (20 lines each)
Priorités de l'enseignant
Straightforward and precise answers: no clap-trap 
Analytical capacity is important
Conseils spécifiques
Answers may be structured with bullet points, etc. 
Answers must be analytical: students may go beyond 
the course, but should avoid private opinions Simple 
English or French dictionary and bilingual dictionaries 
allowed
Langue d'évaluationEnglish or French (student's choice)
Organisation pratique
Institution organisatriceULB
Faculté gestionnaireInstitut Etudes Européennes
HorairePremier quadrimestre - Deuxième quadrimestre
Coordination pédagogique
ContactE-mail address: olivier.costa@ulb.ac.be
Remarques

Course Descriptions - European Cultures and Mentalities in Historical and Comparative Perspective


A link to this form on its native site:

European Cultures and Mentalities in Historical and Comparative Perspective 

( ESP-SOCO-10071 ) 2011 - 2012

P. SCHOLLIERS (email: )
Specialised
6 study points in the 1st semester and 150 hours of study time
26 contacthours Lecture ( P. SCHOLLIERS )

Competences

The teaching aims at providing students with a long-term view of cultural 
developments in Europe, as well as with the way social researchers study 
this development (methods, sources, approaches). This journey into the past 
starts in the 18th century, but most attention will be paid to the 19th and 20th 
centuries. The purpose is to question the concept of "European culture", 
to pay attention to diversity in Europe, and to look at cultural changes over 
time. Mind, the lecturing very deliberately considers the whole of Europe, 
and is not focusing on the EU.top

Previous knowledge

General insights in social and cultural history; broad knowledge of social theories.
Master in Human Sciences
top

Content

The course considers the history of food as a good "proxy" of general cultural 
developments. Food is much more than satisfying plain bodily functions; 
food and drink is about enjoyment, frustrations, and above all, social and cultural 
life. This goes beyond the simple act of eating or drinking: it involves how food 
is cooked, who is eating with whom and where, how people talk and write about 
food, how food is used to celebrate, who does the shopping and the dishes, et cetera.
Since long, the history of food has been studied, and many social researchers have 
stressed the function of food and drink as a cultural phenomenon. Hence, food history 
is used in this course to learn about mentalities and cultures in Europe.
Various themes will be discussed, among which 'Food and Health', 'Food of the Elite', 
'Gender, Age and Food', 'Snacks and Fast Food', or 'Food and Identity Construction'. 
Broad social and economic historical developments will also be considered.
top

Study Material

A reader is available, which includes articles dealing with the above mentioned themes.  
Via PointCarré, students have access to information, notes, powerpoints etc., at 
<http://pointcarre.vub.ac.be/index.php> .
Complementary study material:
A website [built by the students of this course]  (http://www.vub.ac.be/SGES/foodlinks) 
contains a selection of URL's dealing with culture and food history.
top

Mode Assessment

Assessment is based on:
1) the writing of an essay (maximum: 3,000 words, all in), in which each student 
presents a food or drink item that she/he considers as representative (for one's city, 
region, family, country, community etc). Brief oral presentation (MAXIMUM 
10 minutes) during lectures. Written version to be handed in in December. 
IMPORTANT: the written version is a SCIENTIFIC report, which implies 
a regular reference system, adequate language, academic approach, notes etc. 
(40 % of final mark)
2) the collecting of internet addresses that deal with the history of food (max. 5 internet 
addresses; WITH brief annotations) (hand in in December) (10 %)
3) the critical reading and presentation of one paper of the reader [a small group of 
students choose one paper, and present it to the class according to a strict order] (20 %)
4) oral exam (discussion of the paper + one topic that has been discussed during class) (30%)
Example of oral exam question:
a) Why would food be a good proxy for cultural differences within Europe?
b) Explain the relationship between food and identity?
c) Discuss the cultural context of obesity.
top

Additional Information

Students must participate actively in the course by reading texts, consulting internet pages, 
and discuss. ==> IT IS CRUCIAL THAT ALL STUDENTS ARE PRESENT IN ALL 
LECTURES FROM THE START OF TEACHING, since the students' active participation 
requires complex organisation.

Syllabus: Political Science 240

Political Science 240                                                   Mr. Scott MacDougall

Political Theory                                                                                    Fall        
           
Text: Heywood, Andrew. Political Ideologies, An Introduction. Palgrave MacMillan, New York. 2007

Catalogue Description: A survey of selected political theorists and concepts and/or issues from Plato to the present. Includes analysis of theoretical approaches used to explain, instruct, and justify the distribution of political power in societies.

Student Learning Outcome:
         SLO#1. compare and contrast various political theories and theorists.
         SLO#2. recognize fundamental political concepts as expressed by major political thinkers.
         SLO#3. recognize concepts and principles of political thought in the routine operations of political systems.

Description: Political Systems are built around fundamental concepts and values.  The specific set of values and concepts and even the meaning of these elements show considerable variation from system to system.  The purpose of this course is to examine the ideas at the root of politics and how those ideas vary form one system to another.

Attendance: Regular attendance is crucial to the student's success in the course.  It will not be possible to make up the majority of the assignments after they are scheduled. Repeated absence may lead to a student being dropped from the course.

Grading:  Evaluation of the student's performance in the course will be based upon four components. 

For Quizzes and Exams, no electronic device of any kind is allowed.

1) Quizzes:  There will be four quizzes during the term. At the end of the semester the scores from individual quizzes will be totaled, curved and represent 60% of the final grade.

2) Term Paper.  A paper is required.  The assignment will relate to course concepts and the Heywood text.  Details will be distributed the second week of class.  The grade for this assignment will contribute 20% of the final grade.  The paper is due on or before November 25.  There is a penalty (10% /week) for late work. 

3) Final:  There will be a final exam, a two hour in class essay, which will provide the remaining 20%.  To prepare students will choose two of the final five ideologies, about which they will write.

4) Class discussion will be a structured and significant part of the learning experience.  Reflecting this, consistent and constructive class participation is often considered in determining a student's final grade.

Missed Exams: Should a quiz or the mid-term be missed the student must take the make-up exam.  You may only make-up ONE assignment.  If you miss more than one, you will receive an "F" for the other missed work.  A student must request the make-up exam which will be given during Finals Week and will be a comprehensive two hour exam.  A student cannot score higher on the make-up than an average of their other exams.  If a student misses the make-up they will receive an "F" for the missed assignment.

Office Hours: The instructor is available in his office (FO 151) at many times during the week.  Please check the schedule posted in the classroom or outside the office.  You can leave a message at 685-1230 Ext: 2868 or by e-mail at smacdoug@dvc.edu

Student Work:  Any Student Work not retrieved two weeks after the beginning of the next regular term will be disposed of.

 

Schedule


Topic                                                                                                                    Reading


The Concepts and Values of politics                                               Course Reader
Liberty, Rights, Equality, Legitimacy, Rule of Law, Justice, Community, Duty
Understanding Ideology                                                                       Heywood Ch 1

Quiz 

Liberalism                                                                                                 Heywood Ch 2
Conservatism                                                                                          Heywood Ch 3

Quiz


Socialism                                                                                                   Heywood Ch 4
Fascism                                                                                                     Heywood Ch 7

Quiz


Nationalism                                                                                               Heywood Ch 5
Feminism                                                                                                   Heywood Ch 8
Ecologism                                                                                                 Heywood Ch 9
Religious Fundamentalism                                                                   Heywood Ch 10
Multiculturalism                                                                                       Heywood Ch 11

Final Exam



Thursday, September 16, 2010

SABBATICAL LEAVE REPORT - VALUE TO EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM


SABBATICAL LEAVE REPORT Page 2

Name: Scott MacDougall



                                                     VALUE TO EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM

Briefly reflect and highlight the value of your sabbatical leave to the educational program.  In particular:

1.     How will it benefit students, programs, or staff/colleagues?  There is an international dimension to almost everything I do at DVC. Two of the three courses I teach are centered around the government and foreign policies of foreign states. Even my US government class emphasizes “options” typically drawn from practices in other countries. Having had the opportunity to experience the world first-hand has enlivened and improved my curriculum immeasurably.

2.     How will it enhance and/or improve your professional competence?  Having had the opportunity to study comparative politics, international relations and political philosophy in the extraordinarily cosmopolitan atmosphere of the Université Libre in Brussels, Belgium has brought a breadth and depth to my thinking, well beyond that which I possessed before. My understanding of these fields and their key concepts has been refreshed and expanded beyond even what I had hoped for.

3.     How will it relate to your ongoing professional assignment?  The three courses I teach US Government, International Relations and Comparative Politics have each been improved by the collection of new insights and experiences that are being used to add content and color to a curriculum I have taught for 13 years.

4.     How are the breadth and depth of the project appropriate for the sabbatical leave rather than the regular teaching year?  I studied for four months in Belgium, visited 10 countries, engaging in extensive study of five of these. That study involved executing a project with 24 distinct elements in each place, or 120 total elements. It actually took significantly longer to complete than the eight months granted. No complaints.  The time was extraordinarily well spent and though I'm glad the home, I'm not really glad to be done.

Include what you experienced and discovered during the process of completing your sabbatical.  Please see the accompanying reports, organized by country: RussiaGermanyTurkeyCubaChina

10-22-92, Rev. 11-1-94, 10-31-95  (Sabb\Forms\report.frm)

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

Open University Course Summaries

Having never taken an online course myself, yet having considered creating and offering one for my students, the open University courses were a real boon to someone who had originally considered them to be only an emergency substitution for the last-minute cancellation of a Belgian university course.



The approved modification to my sabbatical leave agreement stipulated that I needed 40 hours of Open University courses. There were a lot of fascinating choices. I was tempted to follow further some of the subjects that had been central to my studies in Brussels - questions of culture and national identity. These are central issues to comparative politics and frankly they are my favorite subject, but at the Université Libre I had plenty of that. I decided to suck it up and do my least favorite subject: political philosophy.

With DVC's new AA degree in political science, we created a new course in political theory (Pol Sci 240). For the last several years we have offered that course just one section per year because, for most people, political theory is a lot like going to the dentist  - something you do only if you have to.  Something almost no one does because they want to. It was the same for me, both as a graduate student, where I took as little of the subject as possible and as an instructor, where if I could avoid teaching it, I did.

With only one section a year it was pretty easy to avoid. Over time demand for our major has grown and with it, demand for Pol Sci 240.  We now expect to offer it every semester, perhaps multiple sections, not far in the future. I knew this. That's why I wrote preparing a syllabus for PS 240 into my sabbatical application. And though I knew I could do it, I still did not feel particularly comfortable with the subject.

The Open University courses were a significant help with the task of developing my Political Theory course. The courses I chose provided both a great foundation for understanding the subject as well as insight into what had always been my biggest problem with the subject matter: how do you deal with subjects about which there is the potential for endless debate?  The courses I chose were
1)    Introducing Philosophy
2)    Two Concepts of Freedom
3)    Rights and Justice in international relations.

Introducing philosophy

I suppose the first issue to deal with is the relationship between Political Theory (the subject of our 240 course) and Political Philosophy. Political Philosophy is practically a subset of Political Theory. Theory is a very broad subject. Potentially you could develop theory in any of perhaps a dozen subfields of political science and all of them would be suitable subject matter for the 240 course. What that means for an introductory course at a community college is that you need to create a more limited focus and then develop that. For us, that focus is political philosophy. Even there, though, you immediately confront the dilemma of too many possibilities. There's no way you can do it all.  You have to make choices.

It was very helpful to me to see how the Open University faculty dealt with this problem.  Do you try to do a little of everything?  They did not. What they did was present a methodology for thinking about philosophical questions, the universe of which is near limitless. They established some basic issues that should be considered, regardless of the specific subject:

1)    considering the relevance to “real life”.
2)    The  importance of conceptual, definition
3)    Reason versus Opinion.  Testing beliefs with rational argument.

This was very helpful to me. It gives me a handle on what has always been my biggest problem with political philosophy: how do you create a discrete curriculum from a boundless subject matter? The nature of philosophy is extremely subjective, but as an instructor you have the responsibility to test and evaluate students in a manner that is as objective as possible. I found the criteria used in the Open University courses to be quite helpful in solving that problem.

Seeing how they had presented the question of studying philosophy and then reduced the larger, broader and unmanageable questions down to distinct and specific questions around the example of ‘Two Concepts of Freedom’ validated the approach I have been leaning towards since undertaking to prepare a course to offer as my own Pol Sci 240.

My primary interest and expertise is in the field of comparative politics. It colors how I look at questions of political philosophy and theory. Naturally, it will find its way into my course. I intend to use ideology as a framework and lens through which to examine several key concepts of political philosophy. The second Open University course I took, (A211–2:Two Concepts of Freedom) built upon the foundation established in A211– 1: Introducing Philosophy. It examined in depth Isaiah Berlin writings on ‘Two Concepts of Liberty’. Those two concepts draw the distinction between negative freedom and positive freedom:

Negative freedom is freedom from interference.  It asks the question: how many doors are open? Whether I walk through those doors or not does not matter. It is about the opportunity to do so that is important. Only restrictions imposed by others limit my freedom.  Restrictions I impose on myself or imposed by nature are not included in this class.

Positive freedom is the other class.  It believes that being your own master is the only way to be truly free. It is the freedom to “be all that you can be”.  This freedom may only come if some of your choices are constrained. For example, compulsory education enhances positive freedom yet it is compulsory and hence a restriction on negative freedom.  So, China’s constraints on freedom to facilitate the ‘harmony’ that makes life better is a good thing? Is positive freedom just a fig leaf for authoritarian regimes?

On the question of blending ideology and philosophy… This unit is a great example of the potential** for using philosophical concepts to illuminate the nature of an ideology. An ideology has recognizable form, to its adherents it is a positive force. If an idea is also positive (say, liberty as an example) then it must be massaged into the shape demanded by the ideology. Seeing how people do this, whether consciously or unconsciously but examining the end product (the shape of their ideas) sheds light on both the ideas (philosophies) and on the systems (ideologies)  It is a two-fer.  Students get the philosophical and the practical.

**unrealized potential in this course, because that is not their goal.  But I think it would be quite useful to students.  Philosophy is nice but ideology moves politics

The final course I took seemed to be an excellent extrapolation of the ideas introduced in the philosophy courses. The course was ‘Rights and Justice in International Relations’. It raised some fascinating and important questions: Are rights universal? And how is state sovereignty reconciled with universality?

On universality: There is, of course, a religious basis for some claims to universality. This is the basis for the American view expressed so eloquently in our Declaration of Independence: “we hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights”. If God created us all and God has endowed us all with rights, then those rights must be universal. Is there a secular claim to universality? The UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) creates such a claim. The fact is, that sovereign states have (almost but not quite universally) signed on to this charter. That and subsequent reinforcements (Helsinki Accords, etc.) have established a global consensus. World public opinion recognized universal human rights.

But…. Having a right as a philosophical matter and enjoying that right in practice is not always the same thing. This is where you bump up against the problem of state sovereignty, also recognized in the UN Charter. What happens when a sovereign state appears to be violating a universal right? That is one of the great questions of international politics and Law. The Open University unit does a good job of exploring that issue, though for me the real value was in seeing how they explored the problem of taking a philosophical notion (rights, or justice) from one setting (domestic politics in a western, liberal society) and transferring it to another (the international system).  That model is exactly the one I intend to use in my PS 240 course.

I intend to introduce the students to several competing ideologies (Socialism, Liberalism, Fascism etc.) and then a number of philosophical issues (liberty, equality legitimacy etc.) and examine those issues from the perspective of the different ideologies. I think this will be an interesting and challenging approach for our students and I am excited at the prospect of teaching it. The Open University materials were instrumental in providing the inspiration and mechanics for this approach. It was very useful and valuable.

"Who am I - #1, clue #2:

Not Trotsky, but a good guess.  This guy was no dancer, but his name will be forever linked to Russian dance.

It is not Reagan and not Brezhnev...   Ok, so it is obvious you need a clue (or two) Here you go: "Some thought my end was just the beginning." Uncle Joe was my buddy - with friends like that, who needs enemies?

You may have noticed posts are slowing down.  No real internet connection here in Moscow so this is probably the last you will see until we return to Germany Saturday.  Short version:  Moscow is interesting, but massive and not nearly as engaging as St. Pertersburg.  We are alive, well and managing.  Stay tuned for details.  Keep guessing!